Skip to main content
  • About IHEP
    • About IHEP
    • Message from our President
    • History
    • What We Do
      • What We Do
      • Current Initiatives
        • Current Initiatives
        • Postsecondary Data Collaborative
        • Degrees When Due
        • Assessing The Impact of Prison-Based Postsecondary Education Programs
      • Previous Initiatives
        • Previous Initiatives
        • Global Initiatives
        • IHEP Champions of Access and Success
        • College Not Prison
        • Minority-Serving Institutions-Models of Success Program
        • Film Series: Federal Student Aid History
        • Summer Academy
        • Community Partnership for Attainment
        • Symposium on Financial Literacy and College Success at Minority-Serving Institutions
        • Walmart Minority Student Success Initiative
        • BEAMS
        • Project Win-Win
        • Redefining Access for the 21st-Century Student
        • Reimagining Aid Design and Delivery
        • Pathways to College Network
    • Who We Are
      • Who We Are
      • IHEP Staff
      • Board of Directors
      • Emeritus
    • Partners
      • Partners
      • Funding Partners
    • Working at IHEP
      • Working at IHEP
      • Career Opportunities
  • Policy Priorities
    • Policy Priorities
    • Affordability & Need-Based Aid
    • Data & Transparency
    • Degree Completion
    • Higher Education for Students Impacted by the Criminal Justice System
  • Research
    • Research
    • Publications
    • Search Publications
  • Press
    • Press
    • News Releases
    • Letters, Opinions, and Statements
    • Press Clips
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

25 Years of Equity

Twitter Facebook

  • About IHEP
    • Message from our President
    • History
    • What We Do
      • Current Initiatives
        • Postsecondary Data Collaborative
        • Degrees When Due
        • Assessing The Impact of Prison-Based Postsecondary Education Programs
      • Previous Initiatives
        • Global Initiatives
          • Global Policy Fellows Program
        • IHEP Champions of Access and Success
        • College Not Prison
        • Minority-Serving Institutions-Models of Success Program
        • Film Series: Federal Student Aid History
        • Summer Academy
          • Participating Institutions
        • Community Partnership for Attainment
          • Participating Communities
        • Symposium on Financial Literacy and College Success at Minority-Serving Institutions
          • Participating Institutions
        • Walmart Minority Student Success Initiative
          • Participating Institutions
        • BEAMS
          • Participating Institutions
        • Project Win-Win
        • Redefining Access for the 21st-Century Student
        • Reimagining Aid Design and Delivery
        • Pathways to College Network
    • Who We Are
      • IHEP Staff
      • Board of Directors
      • Emeritus
    • Partners
      • Funding Partners
    • Working at IHEP
      • Career Opportunities
  • Policy Priorities
    • Affordability & Need-Based Aid
    • Data & Transparency
    • Degree Completion
    • Higher Education for Students Impacted by the Criminal Justice System
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Search Publications
  • Press
    • News Releases
    • Letters, Opinions, and Statements
    • Press Clips
  • Donate
  • Contact Us

You are here

Home / Press / Letters, Opinions, and Statements

Invest in the Success of Low-Income Students

By: Michelle Asha Cooper, Ph.D.

Featured in: The Huffington Post

May 15, 2013

For several years, I have watched the higher education community engage in hand-wringing over strategies for improving the educational outcomes for low- and moderate-income students. At present, low-income students remain less likely to enroll and complete college, when compared to their higher-income peers. Given these trends, the attention being dedicated to these students is certainly warranted. However, long-standing efforts designed to improve the outcomes for low- and moderate-income students, such as the federal Pell grants and TRIO programs, are constantly being thrashed and called ineffective. This chorus of opposition is growing more and more audible. While there is a need to enhance these programs to effectively serve more deserving students, I do believe that it is not in our best interest to scrutinize the outputs of these programs, without simultaneously scrutinizing the inputs. 

Investment strategists all confirm that if you want to benefit from an investment, you have to at least be willing to make one. At present, the two major federal college preparatory programs-TRIO and GEAR UP-invest over $1 billion annually and serve over 1 million students; the Pell grant program invests $34.5 billion and serves 9.4 million students (37 percent of all undergraduates). This is a modest federal investment for the number of students served with the current allocations. With that, the issue with federal programs targeted toward low- and moderate-income students is not that they are ineffective; instead they are not funded at a level that would produce a large-scale impact. 

The federal government invests $141 billion for student financial aid combined (i.e., grants, loans, work study, and tax credits in 2010-11). Since most targeted financial aid program for low- and moderate income students make up one-fifth of the total budget, and the targeted college preparatory programs represent less than one percent, it is reasonable to expect modest outcomes for students. But many students who have participated in these programs would dare not call the outcome modest. For them, these programs were absolutely essential to helping them enter and succeed in college. In the case of Pell and TRIO, specifically, the best way to discern the impact of these investments is not through the use of advanced statistical procedures alone. It is also essential to hear the stories and testimonies of these students. 

As the economy continues to improve, many industries are demonstrating the importance of making sound investments. Earlier this month, General Motors (GM) announced that, over the next three years, it plans to invest $16 billion to support operations in the United States. Many believe that this sizeable investment reflects GM's desire to seek growth and expansion within its home market. If GM can make a substantial investment today to secure the future of its home-base operations for the long-term, why can't our nation's educational system do the same? 

Some may say this example is trivial, arguing no basis for comparison between the U.S. educational system and the U.S. automotive industry. To the contrary, when the automotive industry teetered on the brink of collapse, the federal government made targeted investments to help reshape the industry and put it on a path to record profits. If the auto industry had collapsed, the effects would not have been constrained to just those who make cars. Other industries and communities would have been decimated. Likewise, if we continue to avoid substantial investments in higher education, the impact will be felt beyond those students who are not served; the ripple effect will be felt by the entire U.S. economy. 

Although I think there is ample room for comparison between the automotive industry and higher education, for those who disagree, here is another example. In 2011, Henry Ford High School in Detroit was considered a dropout factory, with only 56 percent of students graduating. Just two years later, the high school has instituted new academic and support programs and is expecting a sizeable increase in its graduation rate. What was the catalyst for this turnaround? To fully answer that question, more analysis would be required. But the improvement in outcomes may be attributable, in part, to the United Way of Southeastern Michigan's Network of Excellence initiative, designed to improve graduation rates in Detroit High Schools. The initiative invested in students through smaller classrooms, personalized attention, and a rigorous focus on improving outcomes in science, technology, math, and engineering.

While the design of any program is important, results almost certainly could not have been seen without the collective commitment from organizations such as the AT&T Foundation, Skillman Foundation, and GM Foundation (which alone donated a record $27.1 million to the effort) -- all of whom decided to make a "big investment" in Detroit schools, with the hopes that it would yield "big returns." 

Both the Pell grant and TRIO programs have been around for decades, and like all things there is room for constant improvement and refinement -- a point that both proponents and opponents of the program can agree. However, I want to stress, that is not the point here. Instead, I am advocating for a fair and balanced debate. Any discussion of improving these programs must also acknowledge that these programs are chronically underfunded, yet ironically remain constant targets in budget negotiations. 

If we truly desire to see improvements in college completion and workforce outcomes for the millions low- and moderate-income students collectively served by Pell, TRIO, and other programs, then first, we must stop pretending like it can be done cheaply. Second, when it comes to our policies, we must ensure that our inputs align with our desired outcomes. Third, we must stop denigrating those practitioners who -- in spite of their limited budgets -- still strive to create high-impact educational environments. And lastly, we must rebel against the push in social policy that seems to be growing content with investing the least in those who need the most. 

Michelle Asha Cooper, Ph.D., is the president of the Institute for Higher Education Policy, a Washington. D.C.-based nonpartisan, nonprofit organization celebrating 20 years as a Champion of Access and Success for all students--with a special focus on underserved populations--by providing timely research to inform public policy decisions.

About the Institute for Higher Education Policy

The Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization committed to promoting access to and success in higher education for all students. Based in Washington, D.C., IHEP develops innovative policy- and practice-oriented research to guide policymakers and education leaders, who develop high-impact policies that will address our nation’s most pressing education challenges.

Media Contact

Piper Hendricks
202-372-7204

Archive

  • 2021 (2)
  • 2020 (34)
  • 2019 (15)
  • 2018 (15)
  • 2017 (27)
  • 2016 (24)
  • 2015 (15)
  • 2014 (9)
  • 2013 (9)
  • 2012 (2)
  • 2011 (9)
  • 2010 (10)
  • 2009 (3)

Press

  • News Releases
  • Letters, Opinions, and Statements
  • Press Clips

© Institute for Higher Education Policy 1993-2020.
1825 K Street, N.W., Suite 720 Washington, DC 20006
(202) 861-8223 TELEPHONE (202) 861-9307 FAX
institute@ihep.org  |  Join Our Mailing List | Read Our Privacy Policy | Read Our Informed Consent Policy

© Institute for Higher Education Policy
1993-2014.
1825 K Street, N.W., Suite 720 
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 861-8223 TELEPHONE
(202) 861-9307 FAX
institute@ihep.org
Join Our Mailing List